CHI-Bench: Can AI Agents Automate End-to-End, Long-Horizon, Policy-Rich Healthcare Workflows?

Haolin Chen, Deon Metelski, Leon Qi, Tao Xia, Joonyul Lee, Steve Brown, Kevin Riley, Frank Wang, T. Y. Alvin Liu, Hank Capps MD, Zeyu Tang, Xiangchen Song, Lingjing Kong, Fan Feng, Tianyi Zeng, Zhiwei Liu, Zixian Ma, Hang Jiang, Fangli Geng, Yuan Yuan, Chenyu You, Qingsong Wen, Hua Wei, Yanjie Fu, Yue Zhao, Carl Yang, Biwei Huang, Kun Zhang, Caiming Xiong, Sanmi Koyejo, Eric P. Xing, Philip S. Yu, Weiran Yao

arXiv:2605.16679 · 2026-05-19 공개 · arXiv · PDF

long-horizon tool-calls healthcare-workflows policy-density multi-role-composition multilateral-interaction managed-care high-fidelity-simulator

Abstract

End-to-end automation of realistic healthcare operations stresses three capabilities underrepresented in current benchmarks: policy density, decisions must be grounded in a large library of medical, insurance, and operational rules; Multi-role composition: a single task requires the agent to play multiple roles with handoffs; and multilateral interaction: intermediate workflow steps are multi-turn dialogs, such as peer-to-peer review and patient outreach. We introduce χ-Bench, a benchmark of long-horizon healthcare workflows across three domains: provider prior authorization, payer utilization management, and care management. Each task hands the agent a clinical case in a high-fidelity simulator of 20 healthcare apps exposed via 87 MCP tools, which it must drive to a terminal status through tool calls and writing the role's artifacts, guided by a 1,290+ document managed-care operations handbook skill. Across 30 agent harness/models configurations, the best agent resolves only 28.0% of tasks, no agent clears 20% on strict pass^3, and executing all tasks in a single session slumps the performance to 3.8%. These results raise the hypothesis that similar gaps are likely to surface in other policy-dense, role-composed, irreversible enterprise domains.

한국어 요약

📋 한 줄 요약

**[헬스케어 / 에이전트 벤치마크]** 정책 밀도·다중 역할·다자 상호작용을 모두 요구하는 장기간 의료 운영 워크플로 벤치마크 χ-Bench(CHI-Bench)에서 최고 에이전트도 28%만 해결.

🎯 핵심 기여도

💡 핵심 아이디어

실세계 엔터프라이즈 워크플로의 어려움은 단발 도구 호출이 아니라 정책 밀도 + 다중 역할 핸드오프 + 다자 다회 대화에 있으며, 의료처럼 정책이 두꺼운 도메인이 이를 시험하기 가장 가혹한 환경이다.

🔬 기술적 접근법

📊 주요 결과

💭 의의 및 한계

**의의**: 의료를 넘어 정책 밀도가 높고 역할이 복잡한 다른 엔터프라이즈 도메인에서도 유사한 격차가 나타날 가능성을 시사. **한계**: 한 산업(헬스케어)·한 핸드북 기반 시뮬레이션으로, 실제 운영 환경 전이 검증은 후속 과제.

🚀 실용적 활용